Facebook Events Contact us Learning Platform

Haiying Jiang, Director-General of International Cooperation of the National Audit Office of China: Learn and Progress with Friends

Haiying Jiang, Director-General of International Cooperation of the National Audit Office of China

Haiying Jiang, Director-General of International Cooperation of the National Audit Office of China

China’s first Auditor-General, Mr Yu Mingtao, is turning 100 years old in 2017. He was appointed Auditor-General in 1983 when the National Audit Office of China was established. In a recently published book, he recalled the early days when he, as the new Auditor General heading a new SAI, found the biggest challenge being that “there was no professional capacity to rely on, no working experience to borrow from and no ready laws or regulations to follow, not even theoretical books about auditing was to be found.” Starting from scratch, the National Audit Office of China on the one hand, actively explored ways of audit based on Chinese reality; and on the other hand, intensified international exchanges with foreign SAIs to introduce useful experiences to China. Mr Yu said: -“Experiences of various countries are valuable for us to learn”.

As a matter of fact, even before the SAI was established, China started to learn from SAIs in other countries. In September 1981, Mr Servando Fernandez-Victorio y Camps, then President of Tribunal de Cuentas del Reino of Spain, visited China. As the first head of a SAI visiting China, he talked to a Chinese audience on government auditing, a session the audience described as enlightening. The National Audit Office of China was formally established in September 1983 and joined INTOSAI in the same year, then ASOSAI in the following year. After joining these international organizations, exchanges with foreign SAIs were widely conducted on the platform of international auditing organizations and on a bilateral level. Through these exchanges, Chinese auditors broadened their views, learned and benefited greatly from good practices of other SAIs. Many SAIs provided support and assistance in capacity building to SAI China in this period, such as the SAIs of Spain, Canada, Germany, Australia, Sweden, France, UK, the Netherlands, India, Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia, to name just some of them. Chinese auditors were sent to study audit practices in foreign SAIs and audit experts from these SAIs were invited to China to train Chinese auditors.

The former Auditor-General of Australia Mr Ian McPhee, once visited China in the 1980s, as a trainer for an audit training programme. When he visited China again in 2011 as Auditor-General of Australia, he brought with him photos of the training programme participants, taken in China. Some of the participants, still working with CNAO, could confirm what an important learning experience this programme had been for them and how they had used the techniques they learned, in their audit projects and therewith achieved better results. With this valuable support and help, the National Audit Office of China made fast progress in government auditing. And the learning helped greatly, not only the National Audit Office of China, but also Chinese local audit institutions. Mr Liu Jiayi, Auditor-General of China, believes that audit theory and practice in China is open and inclusive, and has achieved development by drawing on the experiences and practices of auditing of other countries.

In the National Audit Office of China, we never forgot the assistance we received from other SAIs. At seminars on audit practices, in seminar papers, in books about auditing, authors and auditors, and even past Auditor-General like Mr Yu, mention from time to time, how much we benefited by learning from other SAIs. Successful technical assistance projects with SAIs of Spain and Germany were told by older generation of auditors to the younger generation auditors at their induction training programme in the Office. The National Audit Office of China knows well the value of helping each other and the importance of being open and sharing ideas with others in developing audit practices.

As an ancient Chinese poem says: “We get what we need from others, we should also give what we have to others in need”.

We are very happy to share our good practices with other SAIs. Now the National Audit Office of China maintains friendly exchanges with many SAIs worldwide. CNAO has helped train auditors at the request of some SAIs, including seminars, workshops and training programmes. Initiated by the Auditor-General, the National Audit Office of China also cooperated with the Nanjing Audit University to operate a Master Programme for international auditors to study in China under a Chinese Government scholarship. There has been increasing attention on Chinese audit practices such as IT auditing, accountability auditing, real time auditing, public works auditing and environmental auditing et al. Delivering presentations at seminars or attending discussions with auditors from other SAIs, Chinese auditors have learned a lot from other auditors. As the Head of International Relations, I am often told by my colleagues how they have enjoyed attending and lecturing international training programmes, because interactions with the participants is also a good learning experience for the trainers. The truth is that learning is never one way, the more you share with others, the more you learn.

Over 2000 years ago, a Chinese scholar once said: -“Learning alone without any friends, one is cut off from the world and knows little”.

George Bernard Shaw said something similar “If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples, then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you exchange ideas, then each of us will have two ideas”. This is exactly how we should learn, learn by sharing with friends and peers, learn by exchanging ideas. The audit community knows this better than many others, for what INTOSAI promotes exactly, is - “Mutual Experience benefits all”. 

Achieving Impact and Reinforcing Accountability – Sierra Leone's Perspective

Achievements At A Glance

  • Successful capacity development in a post-conflict environment
  • Improved transparency through unprecedented publication of audit reports, and PAC hearing broadcasts
  • Improved accountability for use of public funds through 21% increase in audit coverage
  • Real-time audit of Ebola funds strengthened accountability and financial management
  • National Integrity Award for stance against corruption
  • Demonstrating SAI improvements, through repeat performance assessments

The Challenge

The Audit Service Sierra Leone (ASSL) became an operational independent organization in 2004. In a country context marked by a post-conflict legacy, high youth unemployment, poverty, corruption, weak governance structures and fragile legal environment following the end of the civil war in 2002, Sierra Leone is considered to be among the 10 poorest countries in the world according to the 2015 United Nations Human Development Index.

ASSL faced internal challenges early on. The lack of a strategic plan and audit manuals; low audit coverage; limited human and financial resources, as well as little to no information technology facilities and infrastructure were just some of the obstacles they encountered.

Externally, audited public institutions were without basic systems and documentation, which hampered ASSL´s ability to perform audits.

Parliament was not reviewing audit reports. In fact, audit reports were not published nor were audit recommendations considered. The SAI’s role within the Public Financial Management (PFM) system was weak, particularly given the lack of tools designed to provide oversight regarding the effective utilization of public monies.

The Response

Once fully operational, ASSL immediately embarked on comprehensive capacity development programs led by the United Kingdom Department of International Development (DFID). The goal: strengthen ASSL’s institutional and professional capacity and fulfill its mandate within demanding national limitations.

As of 2016, ASSL’s picture has drastically improved in part as a result of the following activities which are aligned with the INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation principles:

  • Strong SAI Leadership. This has distinguished the organization with country stakeholders, as well as development partners, leading to high levels of SAI ownership when planning capacity development.
  • Long term and scaled-up support. DFID has backed ASSL through organizational, institutional and professional capacity development technical assistance. DFID’s leading role has evolved over the years into a facilitative one, where it now supports ASSL-led initiatives in developing guidance and capacity in financial, compliance and performance audits. ASSL has also benefited from support provided by other development partners, including the African Development Bank; the European Commission; and the World Bank, all of which have harmonized efforts in accordance to ASSL’s strategic plans and core programs.
  • SAI participation at the international arena. ASSL has been capitalizing on INTOSAI global public goods and regional capacity development programs by AFROSAI-E region and IDI.
  • ASSL underwent two assessments under the SAI Performance Measurement Framework (PMF), one in 2012 and one more recently in 2016, producing evidence-based measurements over a period of time that continue to identify areas for improvement.
  • ASSL will also receive support from the SAI Capacity Development Fund (CDF) financed by SECO (Switzerland) and administrated by the World Bank, towards strengthening professional capacity.
  • Public Financial Management (PFM) Reforms. PFM reforms have promoted timely and regularly published reports by the Auditor General. The “2014- 2017 PFM Strategy of Sierra Leone” incorporates ASSL observations.

The Results

Comparing ASSL´s performance in 2002 to 2016 shows tremendous improvements attributed to various capacity development activities.

  • ASSL has implemented sound strategies and policies addressing core audit processes and organizational structures including strategic planning, professional training and stakeholder management, leading to the delivery of significant results despite limited human and financial resources.
  • Repeated PEFA assessments indicate the scope, nature and follow-up of external audit has consistently improved since 2007, including a 21% expansion in audit coverage; enhanced quality of financial and compliance audit work; and the establishment of performance audit as an audit area.
  • Strengthened ASSL-Public Accounts Committee (PAC) relationships have led to improved parliamentary scrutiny of audit reports; public access to ASSL´s reports; and publicly broadcast PAC hearings.
  • Budget support development partners extensively use ASSL’s outputs to monitor fiduciary risk and incorporate into dialogue with Sierra Leone’s government.
  • ASSL’s impact includes the office’s prompt audit on the 2015 Management of Ebola Resources. The report on mismanagement and corruption in the use of Ebola aid funds allowed for strong debates among stakeholders and resulted in increased pressure for accountability.
  • In 2015, the Auditor General was awarded with the National Integrity Award by the Anti-Corruption Commission for her distinguished service in the protection of the national resources and strong stance against corruption.

ASSL must remain steadfast in its efforts to combat obstacles and achieve a positive impact on accountability, good governance, and transparency. ASSL continues to develop. According to the 2014 PEFA assessment, ASSL needs to remain focused on increasing audit scope, further cultivating specialized audit areas and ensuring that its reports are being acted upon. PAC follow-up on recommendations is still a challenge.

We have embraced the sustained support given by our development partners and harmonization development programs with our strategic plans. We hope the intense development assistance to ASSL can continue until we reach a level of matureness where we can make an impact based on our own sustainable capabilities.–Mrs. Lara Taylor-Pearce, Sierra Leone Auditor General

 

The story in other languages:


The Intosai-donor Cooperation

The INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation is a strategic partnership between donors and the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) community.

Purpose: to improve SAI performance in developing countries through scaled-up and more effective support.

Guiding Principles: development of country-led strategic plans; donors respecting SAI country leadership; and improved coordination of support.

Members: To date, 23 donor organizations and INTOSAI

(who comprise the INTOSAI-Donor Steering Committee) have signed the Memorandum of Understanding.

For more information, visit us online at www.idi.no/en/intosai-donor-cooperation.

SAI Bhutan Responding to Emerging Challenges

Achievements At A Glance

  • Enhanced SAI credibility and audit quality through applying international standards
  • Audit report on public debt management debated in Parliament:
    • Public debt policy and debt-thresholds established
    • New Finance Department to ensure public debt levels remain sustainable
  • Leading by example in accountability, through publishing assessment of its own performance
  • New strategic plan to further enhance public confidence in the SAI

The Challenge

For roughly 45 years, Bhutan has been on the United Nation’s list of least developed countries that face severe long-term structural impediments to growth. The country was established as a democratic constitutional monarchy in 2008. While the country has experienced some advancement, challenges remain namely from risks associated with:

  • High external public debt
  • Projected large hydropower-related revenues

The Royal Audit Authority of Bhutan (RAA) was established as an autonomous public audit body in 1985. With a broad mandate and strong legal framework for enforcing audit recommendations, the RAA is also backed by the nation’s constitution that stresses the entity’s importance in conducting performance audits.

Yet, despite these significant advantages, recent performance assessments show that the RAA still experiences difficulty in conducting audits that meet quality standards expected from the international audit community and making a difference to the lives of citizens.

The Response

The RAA has initiated several development programs in an effort to address the challenges. Upon adopting the International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI) framework in 2010 when it was approved at INCOSAI, the RAA has received support through several mechanisms developed by the INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation:

  • Global Stocktaking. The 2010 Global Stocktaking of needs and support provided to the SAI Community resulted in the World Bank’s funding of the 3i Program, where RAA completed Phase 1 in December 2014. The program, implemented by the INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI) aims to support SAIs in ISSAI implementation. As part of the 3i Program, the RAA carried out ISSAI Compliance Assessments (iCATs) to identify gaps, as well as raise awareness of ISSAI requirements.
  • Global Call for Proposals. Following the Global Call for Proposals in 2011, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) backed the RAA’s project proposal designed to enhance professionalism in the delivery of audit services. As part of this project, to be operational from 2012-2017, several audit manuals and policies have been developed, among them a policy document on auditing from a gender perspective.
  • SAI PMF Assessment. The Office of the Auditor General of Norway and the INTOSAI-Donor Secretariat conducted a peer review in 2014 using the pilot SAI Performance Measurement Framework (PMF). Afterwards the final report was published.
  • SAI Capacity Development Fund (SAI CDF). The RAA has support from the SAI CDF, financed by SECO (Switzerland) and administered by the World Bank to further enhance ISSAI implementation, focusing on improving audit quality in all audit streams.

The Results

In 2013, the RAA, with support from ADA, conducted three pilot audits following the new ISSAI framework. According to the SAI PMF assessment, the pilot audits scored significantly higher than other reviewed audits, providing evidence of the program’s success and RAA’s performance improvement. The SAI PMF assessment also provided input toward the RAA’s new strategic plan for 2015 - 2020, which was finalized and published in 2016

The impacts associated with professionalizing audits has extended beyond the SAI, particularly in the realm of public debt, which is a key national challenge. The RAA participated in the IDI public debt auditing program funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The RAA’s audit report on public debt management, completed in 2014, was debated extensively in the Parliament of Bhutan and received positive feedback by the Ministry of Finance (MOF).

External support has been instrumental in enhancing the institutional capacity of our audit office.–Dasho Tshering Kezang, Auditor General of Bhutan

Based on the audit recommendations, the MOF developed a Public Debt Policy that was put into effect August 18, 2016, and provides both a single overall threshold, as well as sector-specific thresholds for external debt. This new policy specifies total external debt should not exceed 25% of total goods and services exports.

Shortly after the policy’s implementation, the MOF established a new department of Macroeconomic Affairs, whose mission is to "maintain a sustainable level of public debt".

Bhutan’s Auditor General has emphasized the importance of internal ownership to development projects. As a result, the activities are primarily carried out by internal staff, ensuring RAA project ownership and product usefulness. External support has also been aligned behind RAAs strategic plan.

All of these factors have contributed to the positive results in Bhutan.

Implementation of ISSAIs is a long term endeavor, and the RAA recognizes more work is needed to ensure audits are performed coherently across the organization and to make the changes sustainable. The RAA has, therefore, included ISSAI-implementation as one of the goals in its Strategic Plan for 2015-20.

The story in other languages:


The Intosai-donor Cooperation

The INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation is a strategic partnership between donors and the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) community.

Purpose: to improve SAI performance in developing countries through scaled-up and more effective support.

Guiding Principles: development of country-led strategic plans; donors respecting SAI country leadership; and improved coordination of support.

Members: To date, 23 donor organizations and INTOSAI

(who comprise the INTOSAI-Donor Steering Committee) have signed the Memorandum of Understanding.

For more information, visit us online at www.idi.no/en/intosai-donor-cooperation.

PASAI Governing Board Meets in Auckland, NZ

The PASAI Governing Board held their 16th meeting in Auckland, NZ from 23 – 24 February, 2017 as part of their commitment to providing strategic direction, governance and leadership to the work of PASAI in the Pacific Region. Among the main issues that they deliberated on during the meeting were PASAI’s Operational Plan 2017/18 – 2012/22 and related budget, and PASAI’s funding strategy. Important discussions were held with PASAI’s two main donors the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) on continuous support for PASAI. The Board also commended the work undertaken in implementing PASAI’s strategic plan in response to SAI members needs. There was also valuable contributions to the meeting from PASAI’s developing partners, DFAT, MFAT, World Bank and the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS). 

“The Board Meeting was a success with some fruitful contributions by members in ensuring that proposed programmes are in line with the objectives of PASAI, affordable, clear expected outcomes and with realistic targets,” said Mr Ihlen Joseph, Chairman of the Board and Public Auditor of Pohnpei State, Federated States of Micronesia. 

Details of PASAI Board members and past Board Meetings are found HERE.

The incoming Congress Chairperson, Auditor-General of Tuvalu, Mr Eli Lopati also advised the Governing Board of the theme for this year’s PASAI Congress being “Promoting Value and Benefits of SAIs through Effective Communication.” He assured the Governing Board that his office is ready to welcome everyone to his island for the 20th PASAI Congress in August, 2017. 

PASAI would like to acknowledge DFAT and MFAT, World Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI) and PIFS for their continued support of PASAI and its work in the region. 

Photo above: The PASAI Governing Board members. 

Photo above: The PASAI Governing Board members. 

Photo above: PASAI Governing Board members with Development Partners and PASAI Secretariat staff. 

Photo above: PASAI Governing Board members with Development Partners and PASAI Secretariat staff. 

Practical Advice for Auditors of Foreign Aid Projects in the Pacific

PASAI completed its first pilot of conducting a co-operative financial audit for the region and selected the topic of foreign aid projects. Six SAIs from Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Tonga, Tuvalu and Samoa participated with the support of INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI). This pilot programme resulted in multiple observations and lessons learned which forms the basis of this regional report. The report also includes practical advice to assist SAIs in the conduct of financial audits of foreign aid projects in the future. It is expected that both SAIs and development partners in the Pacific region may learn valuable lessons from individual SAI reports as well as from this regional report to improve and enhance the quality of the audits of funds provided by foreign aid.

The current PASAI Chairperson, Public Auditor of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) State of Pohnpei office Mr Iso Ihlen Joseph summed up the importance of this topic in his foreword to this report “With a worldwide focus on the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) there is an ever-increasing quantity of aid flowing into developing countries relating to SDGs. This requires governments to be even more responsible for the transparent and accountable use of funds provided by foreign aid, whether it is for SDG implementation or government projects. In the Pacific this can be even more challenging and highlights the need for a strong country financial system to manage these aid funds honestly and fairly, to ensure they are meeting the needs of the targeted government projects.”

The official launch of this regional report was held in Auckland, New Zealand at the Grand Millennium Hotel on 23 February, 2017, during PASAI’s 16th Governing Board meeting which was attended by the Governing board members, PASAI’s INTOSAI representative and development partners from Australia Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT), the World Bank and Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat. All delegates were presented with a copy of this report and it will also be published on PASAI’s website (www.pasai.org) from Tuesday 28 February, 2017.

PASAI promotes transparent, accountable, effective, and efficient use of public sector resources in the Pacific. It contributes to helping its member SAIs improve the quality of public sector auditing in the Pacific to uniformly high standards and assists governments to develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels which aligns with Goal 16 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

PASAI acknowledges the financial support of the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) and the collaborative ongoing joint regional partnership with IDI.

Photo: PASAI Advocate, Mr Eroni Vatuloka handing a copy of the regional report to the PASAI Chairperson, Mr Iso Ihlen Joseph at the launch. 

Photo: PASAI Advocate, Mr Eroni Vatuloka handing a copy of the regional report to the PASAI Chairperson, Mr Iso Ihlen Joseph at the launch. 

Back at number one and it’s personal

“Putting people first in maintaining integrity” was a theme in Lyn Provost’s last speech as Auditor-General at the fifth Transparency International Leaders Integrity Forum last week.

This point was echoed by the Brian Picot Chair in Ethical Leadership at Victoria University, Professor Karin Lasthuizen.

New Zealand has worked hard to have a public sector with high integrity, which has been reflected in our ranking on Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index for a long time. We are usually ranked either first or first equal in the world, but we slipped to second and fourth in 2014 and 2015.

It’s certainly good to be back at number one (at least, first-equal with Denmark) on the 2016 index. But we are not complacent.

In 2012, our Office’s work on fraud helped lead to an increase in awareness and action. Now all of us in the public sector have an opportunity to raise awareness and understanding of bribery and corruption.

Lyn told the Integrity Forum that the second word in “Corruption Perceptions Index” matters as much as the first. She has seen an increase in accusations of corruption during her term as Auditor-General, even though the Office’s inquiries have not upheld those accusations.

The increasing perception of corruption should be of concern to us all, Lyn said.

“Without transparency, allegations of corruption will flourish. Without transparency, people wonder what their politicians and officials are trying to hide. We can hardly blame them.”

As public sector auditors, we meet thousands of public servants committed to improving the lives of New Zealanders. They’re doing a great job, but our reputation is a fragile thing. There is plenty that can go wrong. Public entities can get too focused on avoiding risk, ticking boxes, following processes, and managing throughputs. Of course we need systems, but what comes first in maintaining integrity is concern about people.

Karin’s presentation on research in ethical leadership reinforced Lyn’s emphasis on concern for people. She told the forum that ethical leadership and explicit communication about ethics is particularly important for combatting unethical behaviour. Communication about ethical values and norms, and open discussion about ethical dilemmas, helps reduce perceptions of favouritism inside an organisation, and discrimination outside of it.

The Kiwis Count Survey run by the State Services Commission shows that New Zealanders' trust in public services by experience is consistently much higher than their perception of trust. By both measures, trust has increased markedly since 2007. It shows that their trust is closely linked to their personal contact with the public sector.

In her last address as Auditor-General to the public sector, those at the Forum might have expected a discussion of accounting and financial management challenges and of the systems that could be improved. But Lyn showed the forum the trait that has made her distinctive as an Auditor-General – her willingness to talk about the issues that matter for people.

She challenged the public sector to focus on, and find ways to improve, five issues that trouble us all and blight so many of our lives: and that undermine our integrity:

  1. Suicide – the third leading cause of premature death in New Zealand. Every suicide is a tragedy. Our Office has tried to contribute to this complex problem by looking at how information is collected and used to prevent future suicides.

  2. Mental health – in our Office, as in communities throughout New Zealand, no one’s life is untouched by the pain of suicide and mental health related issues. In the next few months, the new Auditor-General, Martin Matthews, will present a report on acute care of mental health patients.

  3. Māori education – too many Māori children leave school without the education they deserve. The achievement gap between Māori and non-Māori is closing too slowly. As an Office, we are proud of our reports on Māori education, and we hope the sector will have the courage to do what is needed to help Māori students achieve their full potential.

  4. Jobs for youth – we are an organisation that recruits graduates who are beginning careers to become our future public sector leaders and finance managers. Too often we hear the phrase “we want experienced people”! How does a young person get experience with that attitude?

  5. Family violence and its impact on children – in her eight years in Police, Lyn says she saw the impact of family violence again and again. Family violence is not acceptable.

Staying at number one on the Corruption Perceptions Index means making it personal – having the uncomfortable conversations to find ways to tackle the issues that matter for people.

FULL ARTICLE AT: https://oag.parliament.nz/blog/2017/back-at-number-one

“Without transparency, allegations of corruption will flourish. Without transparency, people wonder what their politicians and officials are trying to hide. We can hardly blame them.”
— Lyn Provost

Supporting performance measurement of public auditors in the Pacific

The Pacific Association of Supreme Audit Institutions (PASAI) and INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI) continued with phase II of the SAI Performance Measurement Framework (SAI PMF) project for supreme audit institutions (SAIs) in the North Pacific by facilitating a week long workshop in Guam on 30 January to 3 February 2017. Twenty one staff from nine SAIs including a representative from the United States Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General (US DOIOIG) attended the workshop.

The Speaker of the 34th Guam Legislature, the Honourable Mr Benjamin J.F.Cruz officially openedthe workshop. In his opening remarks, he acknowledged that the work of SAIs is vital and necessary in keeping all government officials including politicians, in line with utilizing public funds and public resources.

SAIs from Guam, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) Office of the National Public Auditor, FSM States of Pohnpei, Kosrae and Yap will conduct peer reviews of each otherusing the SAI PMF framework. Staff from SAIs Cook Islands, Samoa and Tonga who took part in Phase I of this project participated as resource persons to assist with the peer review of the six SAIs in the North Pacific.

The main objectives of the workshop were:

  • To train staff of SAIs who will participate in conducting a SAI PMF assessment;
  • To develop the terms of reference (TORs) for the SAI PMF assessments; and
  • To assess the SAI’s institutional capacity by measuring its independence and legal framework.

The planned activities for Phase II which will be executed in the next few months are peer reviews of the six SAIs and a final workshop to discuss and analyse the results of the assessments. The intended output of this phase is completed SAI Performance reports for all six SAIs participating in the programme.

Camilla Fredriksen, SAI PMF advisor from IDI, hopes that the implementation of Phase II will strengthen the knowledge on SAI Performance in the Pacific and that the results will enable regional bodies and SAIs to identify good practices as well as opportunities for capacity development throughout the region. She added that rolling out the Phase II provides an opportunity for applying the lessons learnt from Phase I, and to strengthen the regional expertise of SAI PMF assessors.

The assessment results will assist the SAIs in taking appropriate measures to ensure they have the capabilities and resources to carry out its responsibilities effectively with professionalism. The results will also assist the SAIs to know if they have the ability to respond to stakeholders’ expectations as well as emerging issues that impact the lives of citizens at large.

This program is aligned with one of PASAI’s strategic goals requiring SAIs to develop performance measurement framework to assist with improving the delivery of SAI’s audit responsibilities.

The workshop was facilitated by a team of facilitators consisting of Ms Camilla Fredriksen, SAI PMF Advisor from IDI, Mr Robert Buchanan, PASAI Consultant, Mrs Sinaroseta Palamo-Iosefo, PASAI Director of Practice Development, Mr Allen Parker and Mr Desmond Wildin of Cook Islands, Mr Marshall Maua of Samoa and Mr Kelepi Makakaufaki from Tonga.

This project is supported by Australian Department of Foreign Affairs, INTOSAI Development Initiatives (IDI) and New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Image of the workshop participants and coordinators 

Image of the workshop participants and coordinators 

Spotlight on Success: Regional Collaboration to Close the Accountability Gap-the PASAI Approach

THE CHALLENGE

Several smaller island nations in the Pacific have limited auditing capabilities. For example, back in 2009, theTuvalu Office of the Auditor-General (TOAG) and the Kiribati National Audit Office (KNAO) were not completing audits in a timely manner. They had backlogs of audits and struggled to keep up with changes to international financial reporting and auditing standards.

One of their main challenges was in the area of human resources, a typical problem faced by small island nationsin the Pacific. The untimely audit of the government’s accounts entailed reduced accountability for the use of public funds in Tuvalu and in Kiribati, as the Parliaments and the citizens did not receive assurance that funds were spent as intended.

THE RESPONSE

The Pacific Association of Supreme Audit Institutions (PASAI) designed a Sub-regional Audit Support Programme (SAS) to support some of the smaller and most vulnerable SAIs that were facing similar challenges with staff capabilities, audit methodologies and systems. The programme was linked to PASAI’s strategic plan and its work program, the Pacific Regional Audit Initiative (PRAI). 

The SAS programme was operational from 2009 to 2016. It supported TOAG and KNAO capacity building by helping them complete financial audits, train SAI personnel and improve information sharing. This effort was made possible by a team of secondees from each participating country and supported by consultants to assist in the audit of public accounts using updated auditing standards.

The Asian Development Bank financed the SAS programme, through the Japan Fund for Poverty Reduction.  The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade have been the primary funders of the PASAI Secretariat, whichhas helped implement the programme.

THE RESULTS

  • The KNAO is now up-to-date with the whole of government audits
  • The TOAG has audited all financial statements submitted, including the whole of government financial statement for 2015
  • The competency, confidence and experience of the staff involved in the SAS programme have significantly increased.
  • The timely completion of the whole of government audits has positively contributed to the availability of up to date and reliable financial information for the respective governments in preparing budgets and in formulating relevant policies, which will benefit citizens

The results in PASAI have been made possible with the support of donors who have aligned behind PRAI and PASAI´s strategic plan, leading to well-coordinated support to the SAIs in the region.

PASAI’s regional approach to capacity development has enabled scarce resources to be utilized in an effective way, as synergies have been realized and peer SAIs have worked together to improve performance at the country level. The approach has included staff training and development, sharing resources regionally and aligning policies to strengthen national capacities. This isa good illustration of the key principles for SAI capacity development in the INTOSAI-Donor Memorandum of Understanding.

On the basis of the same regional approach, the INTOSAI- Donor and PASAI secretariats have designed a programme for measuring performance that is in line with PASAI’s regional priorities. Financed by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, this newly developed initiative facilitates SAI Performance Measurement Framework (SAI PMF) assessments for numerous smaller SAIs throughout the Pacific region. Using a combination of self- assessment and peer reviews, the goal is to effectively address the challenges associated with staff and skill limitations.

The TOAG takes part in the SAI PMF programme. The TOAG assessment was conducted in 2016 using a combination of internal assessment and peer review by the Samoa Audit Office with support from PASAI. Following the completion of the draft assessment, the peer review team presented preliminary findings to TOAG management and staff, who acknowledged and accepted the constructive feedback for improvement.

FOR FULL ARTICLE CLICK HERE

SAS committee May 2013

SAS committee May 2013

SAS Committee May 2014 - signing new MOU

SAS Committee May 2014 - signing new MOU

Martin Matthews - Controller and Auditor-General

On 1 February 2017, Martin Matthews began his seven-year term as New Zealand’s Controller and Auditor-General.

Martin has worked in the public service for more than 36 years.

He joined the (then) Audit Office in 1979 and spent the first 18 years of his career in the office. He was an Assistant Auditor-General from 1990 to 1998, holding various portfolios during this period.

Martin then spent 10 years as Chief Executive of the Ministry of Culture and Heritage. He later served as Secretary for Transport and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Transport, from 2008 to June 2016.

Martin was the select committee’s advisor on the Public Finance Act 1989 and led much of the policy design work for the Public Audit Act 2001.

As Controller and Auditor-General, Martin's principal functions and duties are set out in the Public Audit Act 2001. In summary, they are to:

  • ensure that the office carries out its obligation to conduct audits of public sector bodies, and report to Parliament on the results of the audits; and
  • ensure the efficient, effective, and economical management of the Office of the Auditor-General. 

Martin is a Fellow of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, New Zealand Institute of Management, New Zealand Institute of Chartered Logistics and Transport, and Companion of the New Zealand Institute of Professional Engineers. 

STORY COURTESY OF: http://oag.govt.nz/our-people/martin-matthews

Samoa Legislative Committees strengthens its financial oversight and external scrutiny role

The Pacific Association of Supreme Audit Institutions (PASAI) in partnership with the Office of the Controller and Auditor-General of Samoa, delivered a two-day workshop on the “Financial oversight and external scrutiny roles of Samoa’s Legislative Committees” on 19-20 January 2017 at the Samoa Parliament Conference facility.  Twenty of the 24 members of five Parliamentary Committees of Samoa attended the workshop opened by the Honourable Speaker of Parliament, Hon Leaupepe Taimaaiono Toleafoa Faafisi.  In his opening remarks, Hon Leaupepe Taimaaiono Toleafoa Faafisi stressed the importance of this workshop for members of the five Parliamentary Committees, and was delighted at the opportunity for PASAI to deliver this workshop for the Samoa Legislative Assembly. 

This workshop is the sixth one that PASAI has delivered in the region with the aim to build the capacity of the Members of Parliament who are also Members of Parliamentary Committees.  The objective was to help them better understand their role in providing financial oversight of public expenditure, as well as better understand the specific role of legislative committees within the processes of Parliament. 

Fuimaono Papalii C.G. Afele, Controller and Auditor-General of Samoa hosted the workshop, and was supported by  the PASAI Advocacy Team, Mr Eroni Vatuloka, PASAI Advocate, and Ms Aolele Su’a Aloese, Director of Advocacy, Engagement and Financing in delivering this workshop. A committee member during the sessions commented that “there is a need for building the capacity of Committee members as many are non-accountants and are not familiar with accounting and financial terminologies contained in the audit reports or in the financial statements of the audit entities. A training of this type targeted at non-accountant Parliamentarians will be most helpful in performing their financial oversight and external scrutiny role”. 

The outcomes of the workshop include proposals for: enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the parliamentary committees; increasing efforts in the evaluation of performance of government entities; strengthening the Office of the Controller and Auditor- General; and engaging PASAI to assist in capacity building of the parliamentarians.

This programme comes under Strategic Priority 2: Advocacy for governance, accountability and transparency, of PASAI’s long-term strategic plan.  PASAI is very grateful for the excellent support by the Hon. Speaker of Parliament and his staff, and also the Controller and Auditor-General of Samoa and his team in organising this workshop. PASAI also acknowledges the valued support from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Workshop Participants from Parliamentary Committee members of Samoa, the Controller and Auditor-General of Samoa and the PASAI Advocacy team. 

Workshop Participants from Parliamentary Committee members of Samoa, the Controller and Auditor-General of Samoa and the PASAI Advocacy team. 

Normal
0




false
false
false

EN-NZ
ZH-TW
X-NONE

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false"
DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="3…

Workshop Participants from Parliamentary Committee members of Samoa

PASAI Independence Resource Kit

Excerpt from the CBC website at : http://www.intosaicbc.org/pasai-independence-resource-kit/

PASAI has prepared this independence resource kit under as one of its strategic priority to strengthen SAI independence, and for the benefit of its members. The resource kit is now available on PASAI’s website, for use by SAI’s in the Pacific but also more widely. PASAI will update the kit to reflect development in SAI independence both in the Pacific and globally. Please read more on the PASAI page in the main menu on CBCs website or go to PASAIs website to find out more: http://www.pasai.org/introduction

 

Logo no text.png

Retaining Staff - We train them and then they leave!

Excerpt from the CBC website at : http://www.intosaicbc.org/retaining-staff/

As we implement the ISSAIs, especially the financial audit ISSAIs, we need professional staff but how do we train and re-train them? In one way or other this was a constant refrain in the formal and informal discussions at the recent Congress in Abu Dhabi. Once we have trained people, and especially once they have professional accounting qualifications, how do we pay enough to keep staff. This is not an easy one to solve and is something Auditors-General and Senior Managers wrestle with across the SAI community. But there are some solutions which I have seen work.

At base, it is important to understand the market in which a SAI operates. What is the going rate in the private sector or in other parts of the public sector for qualified accountants or auditors? It is useful to engage a consultancy body with experience of carrying out such comparator exercises? In one country where we did this the comparators were some of the private sector firms but also the Revenue Authority. Knowing the going rate is a useful starting point. A SAI may not need to match the private sector completely because working in the public sector brings many other benefits which are not available to the private sector – usually better pensions, access to wider training opportunities, longer holidays and shorter days, better job protection, a wider variety of work, and the public sector ethos of contributing to wider social benefits. However, having hard data of this kind makes it easier to make a defensible case for salary uplifts (if warranted) with Parliaments and Ministries of Finance.

In situations where a SAI needs to follow public sector wide salary bands, then it can be difficult to make a special case for improvements to the salaries of SAI staff. Again data on turnover or problems with recruiting qualified staff should be collected to help substantiate claims. But equally a SAI can forge links with other key public sector bodies needing to employ qualified financial experts for example the Ministry of Finance, Revenue Authority and Internal Audit Services and make a joint proposal to the Public Service Board or equivalent putting the case for a more market responsive salary scale for financial staff. Such cases can be made stronger if the SAI shows how recruiting qualified financial staff can generate efficiencies and not just lead to an increased staffing bill.

Where the SAI is a training organisation, then it risks losing a proportion of these staff once they gain their professional qualification. The UK NAO provides for this risk by training more than it wishes to eventually retain – recognising that even during training such staff are productive and play a major role in carrying out the routine aspects of the annual audits. At the same time, it is important that these trainees are well supported and motivated during training so that they can see a satisfying career in the NAO when they become qualified. Early in their career we seek to expose these newly qualified staff to a wide range of interesting assignments, to continue to invest in their professional development and to make sure they feel valued members of the organisation. In Rwanda a number of years ago, a colleague asked one of the shining middle-manager stars what it would take from the SAI to keep people like him in the office, as she had identified him as just the type of person the office would need in order to keep progressing. His reply was that a recognition such as that would go a long way. If he only knew that top management saw him as an important part of the office’s development and that they were willing to invest in him that would make a difference. He said nothing about the salary.

It is also sometimes practical to make sure that the accountancy or audit qualification offered by the SAI is one which is oriented to the public sector (so making private sector poaching less likely). In other situations, a SAI may choose to offer staff accounting or auditing certificates or diplomas which are at sub-professional level with only a few being taken through the full courses needed to become full members of the professional associations.

But staff will leave – and it is important that their leaving is managed well. They can be important ambassadors for the SAI when they move elsewhere, they can make useful contributions to improving public financial management elsewhere and in some cases they may want to come back with new skills and experiences into more senior roles in the SAI. It can be a win-win!

David Goldsworthy

Former Head of Technical Cooperation and International Relations , National Audit Office - ‎United Kingdom

Building capacity of auditors on Public Procurement

The Controller and Auditor-General of Samoa Fuimaono Camillo Afele is hosting the Pacific regional program on compliance audit of public procurement which is part of an international capacity building program developed and delivered jointly by the INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI) and the Pacific Association of Supreme Audit Institutions (PASAI). 

Twenty-two auditors from Cook Islands, Fiji, Federated States of Micronesia, State of Pohnpei FSM, Papua New Guinea, Republic of Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga and Tuvalu are participating in this week-long review meeting, which commenced Thursday 15 December and will end on Tuesday 20 December 2016. 

The keynote speaker Honorable Salā Fata Pinati (Minister for Audit Office) formally opened this regional meeting by highlighting the important role that Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) play in ensuring accountable and transparent government procurement practices. The Controller and Auditor-General of Samoa also commented that “This regional program is the first being delivered in the global INTOSAI region and I am pleased to host it, because the subject matter of public procurement is a significant matter which affects all areas of public service delivery which my office is mandated to do.” 

The programme follows the co-operative audit approach with the main objective to support SAIs in moving towards International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) compliance in the conduct of compliance audits. At this review meeting the participating teams obtained feedback from the facilitators/resource persons in relation to their draft audit reports and throughout the week teams were given the opportunity to enhance and improve their draft reports. The facilitators and resource persons for this review meeting is Mr Md Shofiqul Islam IDI program manager for PASAI, Ms Ingvild Gulbrandsen SAI Norway, Mr Ibrahim Aiman SAI Maldives, Ms Violet Roebeck-Fasavalu SAI Samoa and PASAI Director Technical Support, A’eau Agnes Tuiai-Aruwafu. The programme, which is part of the global ISSAI implementation initiative or 3i programme, spans a period of two years and provides blended support solutions by supporting participants in sustainably enhancing their professional and organisational capacity to audit more effectively public procurement. 

PASAI is the overarching regional working group of Supreme Audit Institutions in the Pacific region. We have 28 members that we work with to promote transparent and efficient use of public sector resources with the aim to make a difference to the lives of our citizens. The IDI acts as the capacity development secretariat of the INTOSAI (International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions) which comprises of 192 SAIs. PASAI is a regional organisation of INTOSAI, which operates as an umbrella organisation for the external government audit community and has a worldwide global affiliation with SAIs around the world. 

PASAI acknowledged the financial support and collaborative ongoing joint partnership with IDI and the financial support of the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) including the Samoa Audit Office. 

L-R: Keynote Speaker Honorable Minister of Audit Office – Hon. Salā Fata Pinati, Controller &amp; Auditor-General –Fuimaono Afele, INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI) Program Manager PASAI region, Mr Md Shofiqul Islam&nbsp;

L-R: Keynote Speaker Honorable Minister of Audit Office – Hon. Salā Fata Pinati, Controller & Auditor-General –Fuimaono Afele, INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI) Program Manager PASAI region, Mr Md Shofiqul Islam 

Review Meeting participants&nbsp;

Review Meeting participants 

Regional Workshop on Strengthening Oversight Functions of Public Financial Management through Internal and External Audit, held in Honiara, Solomon Islands

The Auditor-General’s Office of Solomon Islands (OAG) together with the Pacific Association of Supreme Audit Institutions (PASAI) and the Pacific Financial Technical Centre (PFTAC) hosted a Pacific regional workshop in Honiara, Solomon Islands from 5 to 9 December 2016 at the Heritage Hotel. The theme of this joint PASAI/PFTAC workshop ‘Strengthening Oversight Functions of Public Financial Management through Internal and External Audit’, is the first in the Pacific region where the objective was to impart knowledge about the critical roles played by External Audit (Audit Offices or also known as Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) and Internal Audit to improve and contribute to strengthening Public Financial Management to enhance the ability of governments to deliver key services to its citizens.

Twenty-seven auditors from respective SAIs (external audit) and Government Internal Audit divisions/agencies participated in this week-long workshop representing seven Pacific countries

– Cook Islands, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga and Vanuatu. Participants were encouraged to consider co-operation and co-ordination with each other to maximize the benefits gained from working together. Towards the end of the workshop participants from internal and external audit offices of each country spent time to discuss possible collaboration and presented joint country strategies on avenues where they can work together. PASAI/PFTAC will continue to encourage this collaboration through follow up and continuing dialogue with these auditors.

In his opening remarks, the Solomon Islands Auditor-General Mr Peter Lokay stated “This first regional collaboration between Internal Auditors and External auditor is significant because it will promote good governance through contributions to accountability and transparency in the use of public resources, as well as to promote efficient, effective and economic public administration, to make a difference to the lives of our people in the Pacific.

The regional workshop was developed and delivered by a highly experienced team including PASAI’s Director of Technical Support, Agnes Aruwafu (External Audit expert), Sue Morrison (Internal Audit expert), Chita Marzan, PFTAC’s PFM Expert together with invaluable input from Mr Paul Apps, Past President/Board of Directors of the Institute of Internal Audit [IIA

Australia]. A session was also delivered by Mr Mark Thompson and Vance Hetariki from Teammate Wolters Kluwer.

PASAI commended the Solomon Islands Office of the Auditor-General for their excellent support and for making this workshop a great success. This included arranging for delegates to be a part of the national “Walk Against Corruption” with them on International Anti-Corruption Day, 9th December and witnessing the launch of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy by the onourable Prime Minister Mr Manasseh Sogavare.

PASAI acknowledged the financial support of the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) and the collaborative ongoing joint regional partnership with PFTAC.

Normal
0




false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false"
DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="382">

…

Workshop participants

Pacific Auditors participated in the “Walk Against Corruption” to celebrate International Anti-Corruption Day 9th December 2016 with OAG Solomon Islands. Photo taken with Solomon Islands Honourable Prime Minister and Auditor General of Solomon Islan…

Pacific Auditors participated in the “Walk Against Corruption” to celebrate International Anti-Corruption Day 9th December 2016 with OAG Solomon Islands. Photo taken with Solomon Islands Honourable Prime Minister and Auditor General of Solomon Islands 

International Anti-Corruption Day

Pacific Association of Supreme Audit Institutions (PASAI) Members Join the Global Fight against Corruption on International Anti-Corruption Day, 9 December 2016

During the PASAI 19th Congress in August 2016 in Pohnpei, Federated State of Micronesia, Pacific Auditors-General and Public Auditors as Heads of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs)  unanimously agreed for SAIs to participate incelebrating the “International Anti-Corruption Day”, 9th December 2016, as part of the global fight against corruption.  This was in line with the PASAI Congress Theme, “Fishing Together for a Pacific Free of Corruption and Poverty”. 

Today, all around the Pacific, PASAI members will be taking part to show their support and commitment to this important day, contributing towards achieving SDG 16 of the 2030 Agenda.  Activities that SAIs are planning to undertake will include school essay writing competitions, float competitions, market days, press conferences, media releases, publication of audit reports and many more as SAIs join many other organisations around the Pacific on International Anti-Corruption Day.

The United Nations stated, “Every year $1 trillion is paid in bribes while an estimated $2.6 trillion are stolen annually through corruption – a sum equivalent to more than 5 percent of the global GDP.  In developing countries, according to the United Nations Development Programme, funds lost to corruption are estimated at 10 times the amount of the official development assistance”. 

Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) play an important role in the fight against corruption not only in the Pacific but globally as watchdogs of the public purse.  Pacific SAIs can also contribute by advocating for legislative changes to strengthen national systems and institutions to fight corruption, working more closely with other government agencies, increasing public awareness of the issues through its audit reports and engaging with stakeholders in the fight against corruption and poverty.

PASAI Chairman and Public Auditor of Pohnpei State, Federated States of Micronesia, Mr Ihlen Joseph, commented that “the fight against corruption starts with our youth, if we can educate them early, they can contribute to building a culture and a society free of corruption and poverty”.  Mr Joseph leads the way in this initiative with the Pohnpei State Office of the Public Auditor (OPA) hosting an essay contest for high schools, and a float/parade contest for youth groups on the 9th December 2016.  Pohnpei OPA received financial assistance from the United Nations Development Programme Funding specifically for “International Anti-Corruption Day”. 

PASAI Secretary-General, and Controller and Auditor-General of New Zealand, Ms Lyn Provost emphasised that, “the fight against corruption requires collaboration and co-operation between SAIs, national institutions, anti-corruption agencies, civil societies, media organisations and the public at large.  Corruption is a serious crime that can undermine social and economic development in all societies. No country, region or community is immune.  We therefore have to be vigilant and to work together as a region and as organisations to do our part to address this epidemic that stifles economic development, prosperity and democracy”.

‘Communicating and Promoting Value and Benefits of SAI Workshop’ Suva, Fiji

The Pacific Association of Supreme Audit Institutions (PASAI) together with the Fiji Office of the Auditor-General (OAG) conducted the ‘Communicating and Promoting Value and Benefits of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs)’ workshop in Suva, Fiji on 5 – 9 December 2016. This was the third communications workshop delivered by PASAI this year, as part of its programme on communicating the value and benefits of SAIs. The OAG’s Directors and senior management attended the workshop with 30 participants.

Mr. Sairusi Dukuno, OAG Director of Corporate Services opened the workshop, welcoming the special guest speaker, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Economy, Ms Makereta Konrote, PASAI facilitators and workshop participants. Referring to the strategic priorities of the OAG, Mr Dukuno stated, “One of its strategic objectives is to motivate personnel to achieve their potential and nurture a conducive environment for professional and personal development through facilitating continuous learning and development programs for all levels. This five day workshop is a part of the continuous learning.”

Special guest speaker, Ms Konrote gave an encouraging speech, emphasising the important role that the OAG plays in keeping public officers responsible and accountable in how public funds are used. She referred to the principles in the International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI) 12: The Value and Benefits of SAIs – making a difference to the lives of citizens, in her keynote speech. “Dissemination of information to citizens including Parliament and other stakeholders is crucial, so a comprehensive, clear and well-defined Communication Strategy will go a long way to achieving this objective. As auditors, you will also learn the core elements that need to be included while writing reports and the ability to convey information in an accurate, concise and a clear manner. We welcome strengthening of these skills and look forward to seeing the improvements in future reports from the Auditor General,” she said.

The workshop participants were enthusiastically engaged in sessions that included topics such as ‘Identifying SAI Stakeholders’, ‘Stakeholder Engagement’, ‘Communication Strategy Implementation’, ‘Report writing processes’, ‘Writing concisely’, and ‘Dealing with the Media’. The sessions were facilitated by PASAI Director of Practice Development, Sinaroseta Palamo- Iosefo and Communications Adviser, Tina Vaka.

PASAI acknowledges the support from the Fiji OAG in organising the workshop, and the valued support from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.


Normal
0




false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false"
DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="382">

…

Photo: Fiji Office of the Auditor-General Directors and Senior management staff with the Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Economy, Ms Makereta Konrote (front row, second from the right) and PASAI workshop facilitators.

INTOSAI Leading by Example in Performance Measurement

In a historic day for public external auditing, the International Congress of Supreme Audit Institutions today unanimously adopted the SAI Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) as an official INTOSAI document. The SAI PMF is a holistic and evidence-based tool supporting the professionalization of SAIs. It enables SAIs to live up to public expectations of being credible institutions, and to measure and report on their performance.

The need for a framework to support SAIs to better measure their performance was identified at the 2010 INTOSAI Congress in South Africa. The INTOSAI Working Group on the Value and Benefits of SAIs was given the role, and a task team of volunteer SAIs and Donors established. SAI PMF development, consultation and piloting was coordinated by the INTOSAI-Donor Secretariat in the INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI). INTOSAI published a Pilot Version of the SAI PMF in 2013, which was piloted in more than 20 volunteer SAIs from Brazil to Nepal (being the first to publish its assessment), and from Burkina Faso to the Slovak Republic during 2013-15. Experience from the pilot assessments, and global consultation, led to extensive lessons learnt and ultimately development and approval of the SAI PMF.

INTOSAI also gave its support to the SAI PMF Implementation Strategy for 2017-19, including the INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee taking on the role of INTOSAI strategic governance lead and a new SAI PMF unit within IDI taking the role of the operational lead for SAI PMF support. This will ensure SAI PMF is firmly anchored within INTOSAI, and provide support to SAI PMF as a tool that all heads of SAIs are encouraged to utilise, on a voluntary basis.

Meanwhile, SAIs around the world continue to utilise SAI PMF to support needs assessments, strategic planning and performance management. In 2016, Sierra Leone became the first country to conduct a repeat assessment, through peer review, providing objective evidence of performance improvement since its first assessment in 2012. In November, New Zealand completed its self-assessment, tabling a summary of the report in Parliament and publishing the assessment in full. Auditor General Lyn Provost noted that "the results were largely as expected, which is pleasing. However, the assessment has also identified a few areas which require more focus within our SAI, which should lead to further improvements in our performance".

Throughout 2016, SAIs across the Pacific have worked together, with support from IDI, to undertake peer-assessments through a coordinated, regional approach.

The development and piloting of SAI PMF represented a successful partnership effort between INTOSAI and the donor community. The INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation, involving INTOSAI and 23 international development partners, provided significant funding and strategic advice, built on experience from similar tools such as the Public expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) framework. Individual assessments in different countries have been resourced by combinations of SAI's own resources, in-kind support from peer SAIs, and donor funding, especially from the Inter-American Development Bank in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Donor Community will remain involved in SAI PMF implementation, through voluntary membership of a SAI PMF Independent Advisory Committee, as well as by supporting implementation efforts at the regional and country level.

Contact Details

SAI PMF Secretariat in IDI: saipmf@idi.no

http://www.idi.no/artikkel.aspx?MId1=102&AId=704